Dating apps advertise a range of safety tools, including photo checks, scam detection and reporting. Below is what each one actually publishes, and the one thing none of them can do: tell you whether a real, verified person is being honest with you.
Dating-app photo verification can help check whether a selfie matches profile photos. It does not guarantee identity or honest intentions. Safety features differ by app and region, and a video call or meeting cannot certify trust. Use the app’s reporting tools, protect personal information and do not send money or try an investment because a match asks you to.
Safety guidance corrected 6 October 2026. The dataset review date and deposited version below are unchanged.
Match Group app
Bumble Inc.
Match Group app
Match Group app
Match Group app
Match Group app
Grindr Inc.
WINK TECH LIMITED — the college-marketed newcomer
Feeld Ltd — the open-minded / non-monogamy segment
Pure App — the anonymous hookup segment
Perry Street Software — the gay / queer hookup segment
Photo matching, identity checks, scam detection and reporting address different risks. None makes every account safe to trust. A passed photo check does not tell you whether a financial proposal is genuine. That gap has a price tag: the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center recorded $929 million in confidence-and-romance-scam losses across 23,159 complaints in 2025.
One structural note: Tinder, Match.com, Hinge, OkCupid and Plenty of Fish are all Match Group apps and share much of the same verification infrastructure — so their photo/selfie checks work alike, and the discontinued Garbo background-check partnership affected all of them.
Tinder’s Photo Verification guidance explicitly warns that a badge does not guarantee the authenticity of a user’s information. The FBI’s warning about AI-enabled fraud describes synthetic video used in real-time chats and private messages to make an online contact seem real. A convincing call is therefore not a fraud test. Read more about AI romance scams and keep financial decisions separate from a new relationship.
So use the features — verify your profile, keep the chat where the moderation lives, report anything off. But remember what they can and can't do. If something feels off about someone you've met on an app, run it through our romance-scam checker, which reads the behaviour the badge can't. Reviewed August 2026.
The index asks one question of each app, and answers it only from what the platform itself publishes: what does this app actually verify, and what does it explicitly not do? Every row is sourced to the platform's own safety, help or newsroom page, or to a named authority. Where a claim could not be confirmed on a platform-owned page, it is omitted rather than guessed.
That discipline matters here, because this category is full of features that sound like safety and are not. Photo verification is designed to compare a selfie with profile photos. It differs from an identity-document check, and neither guarantees honest intentions. The index separates these features so a badge is not mistaken for a broader assurance.
The single most important column is the one that is empty for every app: background checks. Tinder offered them through Garbo from 2022; that partnership ended in 2023, and across all 12 apps no replacement is live. We also note the structural point once: Tinder, Match.com, Hinge, OkCupid and Plenty of Fish are Match Group apps sharing much of the same verification infrastructure, so they are not 12 independent safety regimes.
New in v2.0.0, and the sharpest finding in this release: of 12 apps, exactly 1 documents true two-factor authentication on the account itself. That is eharmony, which emails a 4-digit code when a login is attempted from an unrecognised device. Everywhere else the SMS or email code is the login, which is not the same thing: a code that replaces a password protects nobody who has already been SIM-swapped or had their inbox taken. Grindr is the only app publishing a PIN plus biometric lock on the app itself, which answers a different threat, somebody holding your unlocked phone.
Only 4 of 12 check a government ID at all, and where they do it is usually narrower than it sounds: Hinge's is an age check that becomes compulsory once prompted, and PURE's exists to prove age in the United Kingdom rather than to prove who anyone is. A photo badge and an ID check are different claims, and most apps only make the first.
What happens to the face afterwards varies more than anything else here, and the real split is not between companies but between kinds of check. A one-off verification is cheap to forget: OkCupid purges its facial-geometry template within 24 hours, Hinge deletes Selfie Verification data inside the same window, and Bumble's ID partner Veriff deletes within 72 hours. The newer biometric age checks keep far more, and keep it far longer. On Tinder and on Hinge alike, the FaceMap and the FaceVector derived from your video selfie are retained for the lifetime of the account and deleted within 30 days of closure, with audit images held for 90 days past closure on Tinder and up to a year if the account was banned. Bumble keeps biometric scans up to three years after your last interaction, and Grindr retains data for as long as the account is active. And 3 of 12 still publish no retention period at all, which is the answer you get for handing over your face and then asking what happens to it.
Last reviewed August 2026. Platforms ship new tooling often — each row links its source so any claim can be checked, and corrected, at source.
This index is free to cite, with credit (CC BY 4.0). The one-line finding: not one of the 12 major dating apps publishes a background-check programme, and only 1 of 12 offers two-factor authentication on the account itself.
The dataset is archived with a permanent DOI, so it stays citable and resolvable independently of this site: 10.5281/zenodo.21440084 (CSV + JSON + methodology, 2.2.0). That is a concept DOI, so it always resolves to the newest version rather than pinning to one deposit. To cite this exact revision instead, use 10.5281/zenodo.22227448.
Suggested citation: Tutela Digitalis (2026). The Tutela Digitalis Dating App Safety Index (Version 2.2.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21440084
Need the underlying data, a correction, or a quote? Email press@tuteladigitalis.com. We publish corrections.
Established dating apps provide verification, reporting and moderation tools, but no feature guarantees that a match is honest or safe. Photo checks and identity checks serve different purposes, and availability varies by app and region. Use the app’s own safety tools, protect personal information and refuse pressure to send money or try an investment. A badge, video call or meeting does not make a financial request trustworthy.
Photo verification compares a selfie with profile photos. It can help detect a mismatch; it is not a guarantee of identity or honesty. A background check searches records associated with an identity and also has limits. The Match Group–Garbo partnership ended in 2023, so this index does not describe that discontinued service as a current feature. Neither type of check certifies that a person is safe to trust with money.
A verified badge means an account passed a particular check. Read what that check covers before drawing conclusions: matching photos is different from checking an identity document. Neither establishes honest intentions. A successful video call or an in-person meeting also cannot certify a financial proposal. Keep control of your personal information and do not send money or use a trading platform because a match asks you to.
Moving off a dating app takes the conversation outside that app’s message moderation and warning tools. An early, insistent push to leave is a reason to slow down, especially when followed by secrecy or financial pressure. It does not prove fraud by itself. Keep relevant messages and use the dating app’s reporting process if you suspect a scam, including when the harmful exchange happened elsewhere.
Pressure to send money or use a suggested investment platform is a major warning sign, however convincing the relationship feels. Emergency stories, crypto deposits and fees to release supposed profits are reasons to stop and seek an independent view. Do not pay to prove trust. If you have already sent money, contact your bank or payment provider promptly, save the messages and report the suspected scam.
No — it's a safety reference, not a ranking. We're not scoring the apps against each other or recommending one; we're documenting what each platform publishes about its own anti-scam and verification tools, so you can see what protection you actually have and where the gap is. Every entry is sourced to the platform's own safety or help page and reviewed periodically. Features change, so confirm current details with the app itself.
Treat each feature according to its stated purpose. Selfie and identity checks, scam detection and reporting are different tools; they should not all be described as proof that a person is real or honest. Compare the platform’s current help pages linked in the entries above, including regional availability and privacy terms. None of these tools makes a match’s request for money safe.
This index documents published features; it does not establish which app has the lowest scam rate. Counting verification tools is not a reliable safety ranking. Compare what each check does, how your information is handled and how to report a problem. Staying on-platform can preserve access to moderation, but neither that choice nor a video call guarantees safety. Keep dating separate from payments and investment decisions.
The entries above compare the safety processes Duet and Hinge publish, with links to their own documentation. Differences in documentation or verification design do not establish which app is safer in practice. Check the current requirements and privacy terms for your region. On either app, a verification badge is not proof of honest intentions, and a video call or meeting is not a reason to trust a request for money.
Check what the app’s badge actually means and use verification only through the app you opened yourself. An absent badge is not proof of fraud, and a present badge is not proof of honesty. Look for inconsistencies, secrecy and pressure involving money or personal information. Video calls can help a conversation, but real people and synthetic video can both be used to deceive. You do not need to meet someone to investigate a suspicion.
Established dating services can be legitimate businesses while still hosting fraudulent accounts. Fake sites can also impersonate real services. Open the service independently rather than following a match’s link, and check its official app or website. A legitimate platform does not authenticate every message or financial proposal on it. Do not enter card details or upload identity documents to a site a match sends you as a supposed safety requirement.
Tinder’s Photo Verification compares a video selfie with profile photos. Tinder explicitly warns that the badge does not guarantee the authenticity of a user’s information. Other features, including identity checks and reporting, have their own purposes and availability. This index records those published tools rather than claiming Tinder has eliminated catfishing. Use the tools, but do not treat a badge or a successful call as permission to send money.